8/10/2001 - john w k, seminole, FL writes ...
Stem Cell Research Funding and Free Enterprise
American Constitutional Research Service Seminole, FL 33775 727 391-1187 The answer was in your oath Mr. President John William Kurowski August, 2001 Was the Presidents decision on government funded stem cell research and regulation a difficult one? Not really! All that was necessary for the President to do was to have confidence in, and abide by, the oath he took to support the Constitution of the United States. Being limited by the intent of those who framed and ratified that document, his proper choice was to return this question to the People, and ask them to express their will via Article V of the Constitution, and, either provided or refuse the necessary power to Congress to allow government funding and regulation of stem cell research. The framers and ratifiers wisely provided Article V, the amendment process___ a lawful means to effect change to accommodate changing times__ and to do so by reason and choice of the people, and not by the arbitrary acts of a national legislature or a presidential edict! This amendment process is one of the important distinguishing characteristics of our constitutional limited republic, as opposed to a representative democracy in which folks in government are free to impose their will upon the people without the peoples consent. As Hamilton states in Federalists 78: until the people have by some solemn and authoritative act [a constitutional amendment] annulled or changed the established form, it is binding upon themselves collectively, as well as individually; and no presumption, or even knowledge of their sentiments, can warrant their representatives in a departure from it, prior to such an act. [see Federalists 78, Hamilton] Those who pretend Congress has constitutional authority to fund and regulate stem cell research are far removed from historical fact. In general, the founding fathers agreed free enterprise to be the best depository in the advancement of science, and intentionally sought to promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts by granting a limited power to Congress to protect the work of authors and inventors by issuing patents and copyrights only! Madison's Notes on the convention of 1787 reveals that Charles Pickney, on August 18th, of the federal convention, proposed a power to be vested in Congress "To establish seminaries for the promotion of literature and the arts and sciences", but this proposal, as many other proposals, was rejected by the Convention, and the only power agreed upon by the Framers and Ratifiers relating to the advancement of science, was the limited power "To promote the Progress of Science and useful Arts, [How?] by securing for limited Times to Authors and Inventors the exclusive Right to their respective Writings and Discoveries." This prohibition against government involvement in the promotion of science is again confirmed on February 7th 1792 by Representative John Page speaking before the House of Representatives: "The framers of the Constitution guarded so much against a possibility of such partial preferences as might be given, if Congress had the right to grant them, that, even to encourage learning and useful arts, the granting of patents is the extent of their power. And surely nothing could be less dangerous to the sovereignty or interest of the individual States than the encouragement which might be given to ingenious inventors or promoters of valuable inventions in the arts and sciences. The encouragement which the General Government might give to the fine arts, to commerce, to manufactures, and agriculture, might, if judiciously applied, redound to the honor of Congress, and the splendor, magnificence, and real advantage of the United States; but the wise framers of our Constitution saw that, if Congress had the power of exerting what has been called a royal munificence for these purposes, Congress might, like many royal benefactors, misplace their munificence; might elevate sycophants, and be inattentive to men unfriendly to the views of Government; might reward the ingenuity of the citizens of one State, and neglect a much greater genius of another. A citizen of a powerful State it might be said, was attended to, whilst that of one of less weight in the Federal scale was totally neglected. It is not sufficient, to remove these objections, to say, as some gentlemen have said, that Congress in incapable of partiality or absurdities, and that they are as far from committing them as my colleagues or myself. I tell them the Constitution was formed on a supposition of human frailty, and to restrain abuses of mistaken powers. Annals of Congress Feb 1792 Rep Page Unfortunately, judging from the Presidents decision, we have learned he is not a friend of our constitutional limited republic, but a friend of those who are engaging in an ongoing subjugation of our nation by supplanting a government by the rule of man, rather than the rule of law our constitution, which has once again been wounded and left crippled by those who took an oath to preserve and protect it. John William Kurowski American Constitutional Research Service Seminole, FL [Permission is hereby given to reprint this article if credit to its author and the ACRS appears in such reprint. No copyright is claimed for quotes within the article which are public domain materials.]
10/30/2003 - RY, Miami, FL writes ...
Calling for Constitution Convention
CONSTITUTION CONVENTION OF THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA
We the people of the United States of America are petitioning the states legislatures for a new Constitutional Convention to rewrite the United States Constitution. The 21st Century brings new challenges and now summons Americans to include rights of the people in the highest law of the nation. The convention shall be set forth by the people and the citizens wherein each state shall elect 3 delegates to vote on the language drafted thereof. Your signature supports a new Constitution Convention and elects the delegates in your states.
Print Cong. District/State Your Signature
Mail Petitions to: BOLD, 6601C Willow Pointe Drive, Hsv, AL 35806
Article I - The Legislative Branch
Section 1 - The Legislature
Section 2 - The House Changed
Section 3 - The Senate
Section 4 - Elections, Meetings
Section 5 - Membership, Rules, Journals, Adjournment
Section 6 - Compensation
Section 7 - Revenue Bills, Legislative Process, Presidential Veto
Section 8 - Powers of Congress Changed
Section 9 - Limits on Congress
Section 10 - Powers prohibited of States
Article II - The Executive Branch
Section 1 - The President Changed
Section 2 - Civilian Power over Military, Cabinet, Pardon Power, Appointments
Section 3 - State of the Union, Convening Congress
Section 4 - Disqualification
Article III - The Judicial Branch
Section 1 - Judicial Powers
Section 2 - Trial by Jury, Original Jurisdiction, Jury Trials
Section 3 - Treason Changed
Article IV - The States
Section 1 - Each State to Honor all others
Section 2 - State citizens, Extradition
Section 3 - New States
Section 4 - Republican government Changed
Article V - Amendment
Article VI - The United States
Article VII - Ratification
Amendment 1 - Freedom of Religion, Press, Expression
Amendment 2 - Right to bear Arms
Amendment 3 - Quartering of soldiers
Amendment 4 - Search and Seizure Changed
Amendment 5 - Trial and Punishment, Compensation for Takings
Amendment 6 - Right to speedy trial, confrontation of witnesses
Amendment 7 - Trial by jury in civil cases Changed
Amendment 8 - Cruel and Unusual punishment Changed
Amendment 9 - Construction of Constitution
Amendment 10 - States' Rights Changed
Amendment 11 - Judicial Limits
Amendment 12 - Choosing the President, Vice President Changed
Amendment 13 - Slavery Abolished Changed
Amendment 14 - Citizenship Rights Changed
Amendment 15 - Race no bar to vote Changed
Amendment 16 - Income Tax authorized
Amendment 17 - Senators elected by popular vote
Amendment 18 - Liquor abolished
Amendment 19 - Women's suffrage
Amendment 20 - Presidential, Congressional terms
Amendment 21 - Amendment 18 repealed
Amendment 22 - Presidential Term Limits
Amendment 23 - Presidential vote for District of Columbia Changed
Amendment 24 - Poll taxes barred Changed
Amendment 25 - Presidential disability and succession
Amendment 26 - Voting age set to 18 years Changed
Amendment 27 - Congressional pay increases
[ Link to the U. S. Constitution ]
We the people of the United States call for a Constitutional Convention to rewrite this ever changing document called the United States Constitution. We are invoking Amendment 10, and seek hold the Convention to discuss including rights in this document that put all Americans on level fields without amendments that are sometimes non enforceable in their entirety. Rewritting this document get women, blacks, hispanics and isians those rights guarantee by the forefathers this day of October, 22nd 2003 on behalf of all Americans.
3/26/2006 - PKT, Los Angeles, CA writes ...
Ginsburg's Global Constitution
It should be pointed out that James Madison said in Federalist Paper 63, "An attention to the judgment of other nations is important to every government for two reasons: the one is, that indepependlty of the merits of any particular plan or measure, it is desireable on various accounts that it should appear other nations as the offspring of a wise and honorable policy. The second is, that in doubtful cases, particularly where the national councils may be warped by some strong passion or momentary interest, the presumed or known opinion of the impartial world may be the best guide that can be followed."
In other words, when the public passions are so hight tht impartiality may be impossible it is perfectly acceptable to look to the rest of the world for guidance. Strict constructionists who constantly refer to the source documents might do well to reflect on the Founding Fathers liberalism when it came to the broader issues and knowledge that the popular passions of the moment might not be in the best interests of the country.
[Editors' Note: It needs to be noted quickly that the point of constitutional "constructionism" -- or original intent -- is to avoid bending the law to the "popular passion", unless said passion carries sufficient weight and endurance to sustain a constitutional amendment.]
2/4/2014 - TM, Chester, NJ writes ...
The Imperial Presidency of Barack Obama
Stop whining, and do something about it.
With over 500 in congress, how can a President get away with breaking laws, not enforcing laws and changing laws on his own?
The answer is simple - because Congress lets him, and our apathetic population keeps voting Congress back in.
So, stop whining America. You want change? Vote responsibly next time and kick out your corrupt and complicit representatives.
Most importantly, vote for a President who has experience. Not an empty suit that promises "hope and change" without ever defining what that means or what his vision actually is.
12/21/2016 - TM, Chester, NJ writes ...
Hillary Clinton Supporters Need to Quit Whining Ab
In fact, the Electoral College did exactly what is was designed to do - provide a fair election process for all 50 states.
Excluding California and New York, Donald Trump won by over 3 million votes. That is the type of representation that the Electoral College was designed for - so that one or two over-populous or over-cared for (read paid for) states could not run the Republic.
Punch this link to offer a new thread with your submission.