Think you know your stuff about U.S. Wars & Conflicts?  Click to find out!
Read what the Supreme Court thinks about Rights of Accused in Weeks v. United States

Site Links

• Home Page
• The Foundations
     of Americanism

• Historic Document
     Library

     • The Declaration of
        Independence

     • The U.S. Constitution
     • The Bill of Rights
     • The Amendments
• Supreme Court Cases
• Today In History
Article Archives --
     • Editorials
     • Opinion
     • In-Depth
     • Headlines
     • Court Challenges

• About Us

Site Search

Go
     Search Tips

Read or Post Mail
by Topic


Opinion & Analysis
Sources

Ryan T. Anderson
Michael Barone
Brent Bozell
Tucker Carlson
Mona Charen
Adriana Cohen
Ann Coulter
Veronique de Rugy
Diane Dimond
Erick Erickson
Jonah Goldberg
John C. Goodman
Tim Graham
Victor Davis Hanson
Froma Harrop
David Harsanyi
Mollie Hemingway
Laura Hollis
Jeff Jacoby
Rich Lowry
Heather Mac Donald
Mychal Massie
Daniel McCarthy
Betsy McCaughey
Stephen Moore
Andrew P. Napolitano
Dennis Prager
Scott Rasmussen
Damon Root
Debra J. Saunders
Ben Shapiro
Mark Shields
John Stossel
Jacob Sullum
Cal Thomas
Hans von Spakovsky
George Will
Byron York


Historic Document
Know Your Stuff?

Fact lists about ...
U.S. Presidents
States & Territories
States Ranked
U.S. Chief Justices
U.S. Wars & Conflicts
Fed'l Debt & Spending
116th Congress

Flash Stats on ...
Congress
The Supreme Court
Tax Freedom Day

Take our
Americana Quiz


The Tonkin Gulf Resolution
1964

Document Start    Return to Library

As U.S. warships cruised off the coast of North Vietnam in the Gulf of Tonkin gathering intelligence and shelling minor positions, several North Vietnamese patrol boats purportedly attacked them. When the American ships called for air support from offshore aircraft carriers, U.S. warplanes drove off the attackers and bombed a petroleum storage depot.

The incident provided President Lyndon Johnson with a reason to ask Congress for power to "protect American interests" in Southeast Asia, where the struggle between Communist insurgents supported by the North Vietnamese, and the corrupt but marginally democratic regimes in the South, had thus far only involved U.S. military advisors and occasional Special Forces.

In his address to Congress, LBJ reiterated the domino theory by pointing out that "the issue is the future of southeast Asia as a whole. A threat to any nation in that region is a threat to all, and a threat to us." Communism had made enough inroads in smaller countries during the post-colonial late fifties and early sixties to lend serious weight to his statement.

Unfortunately, there was a less honest side to the issue, including his statement that "the United States intends no rashness, and seeks no wider war." It's fair to assume that LBJ saw what was coming, and was even being pressured to widen the War as he made this request. (In fact, recent publications covering his White House audio tapes appear to reveal that, while he was promising not "to send American boys to fight a land war in Asia" during the 1964 election, he had, in fact, already developed his escalation plan, a plan which held no expectations of actually winning the war.)

The joint Resolution was passed by both houses of Congress on August 7, 1964. By the following year, the contingent of advisors and Green Berets had grown to almost 100,000 combat troops. By 1969, a peak of 538,000 troops were serving in the theater.

Despite his less laudible motives, Johnson's fear of appearing weak to Communism was real and justifiable, given the legacy of Stalin and Mao. The political machinations used to escalate the war, the failure of leadership in uniting the American people behind it, and the lack of resolve in pursuing it to a clearer, and earlier conclusion, less destructive in military and human terms, weigh heavily in its legacy.



Got a favorite historical document? Use the  Library comment link  to let us know - we'll look into it.


The Tonkin Gulf Resolution
1964

Joint Resolution of Congress
H.J. RES 1145
August 7, 1964

(Department of State Bulletin, August 24, 1964)

Resolved by the Senate and House of Representatives of the United States of America in Congress assembled,

Section 1. That the Congress approves and supports the determination of the President, as Commander in Chief, to take all necessary measures to repel any armed attack against the forces of the United States and to prevent further aggression.

Section 2. The United States regards as vital to its national interest and to world peace the maintenance of international peace and security in southeast Asia. Consonant with the Constitution of the United States and the Charter of the United Nations and in accordance with its obligations under the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty, the United States is, therefore, prepared, as the President determines, to take all necessary steps, including the use of armed force, to assist any member or protocol state of the Southeast Asia Collective Defense Treaty requesting assistance in defense of its freedom.

Section 3. This resolution shall expire when the President shall determine that the peace and security of the area is reasonably assured by international conditions created by action of the United Nations or otherwise, except that it may be terminated earlier by concurrent resolution of the Congress.

Got a favorite historical document? Use the  Library comment link  to let us know - we'll look into it.


Copyright © 1999-2024 Common Sense Americanism - All rights reserved
Localizations by DB-IP
Privacy Policy   Submitting Articles   Site Guide & Info
Home Page